Implementation of pharmaceutical alternatives to a toxic drug supply in British Columbia: A mixed methods study

Original research
par
Pauly, Bernadette et al

Date de publication

2024

Géographie

Canada

Langue de la ressource

English

Texte disponible en version intégrale

Non

Open Access / OK to Reproduce

Non

Évalué par des pairs

Yes

L’objectif

Our objective was to describe early implementation of Risk Mitigation Guidance (RMG) among prescribers in BC.

Constatations/points à retenir

Analysis of administrative databases demonstrated limited uptake of the intervention outside large urban centres and a highly specific profile of urban prescribers, with larger and more complex caseloads associated with RMG prescribing. Nurse practitioners were three times more likely to prescribe than general practitioners. Qualitatively, the study identified five themes related to the five CFIR domains: 1) RMG is helpful but controversial; 2) Motivations and challenges to prescribing; 3) New options and opportunities for care but not enough to ‘win the arms race’; 4) Lack of implementation support and resources; 5) Limited infrastructure.

La conception ou méthodologie de recherche

We conducted a convergent mixed methods study drawing population-level linked administrative health data and qualitative interviews with 17 prescribers.

Mots clés

Safer supply
Policy/Regulatory
About prescribers
Rural/remote
Barriers and enablers
Hesitancy of prescribers